首页> 外文OA文献 >Does lower limb neuromuscular control differ during side-step and split-step cutting manoeuvres?
【2h】

Does lower limb neuromuscular control differ during side-step and split-step cutting manoeuvres?

机译:在分步切割和分步切割操作中,下肢神经肌肉控制是否有所不同?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

During side-step cutting, all the monitored muscles were recruited simultaneously reflecting co-contraction. Conversely, during split-step cutting, rectus femoris was initially recruited, followed by synchronous vastii and medial hamstrings onset and then lateral hamstring muscle onset. Although there were subtle differences in onset, the hamstrings ceased activity earlier than the quadriceps muscles in both cutting manoeuvres. Paired t-tests indicated that vastus medialis displayed a significantly (p \u3c 0.02) earlier onset in the side-step compared to the split-step and rectus femoris displayed significantly (p = 0.05) longer burst duration in the split-step compared to the side-step. Whether these altered neuromuscular patterns are protective to the knee during split-step cutting manoeuvres, perhaps due to reduced anterior drawer, warrants further investigation. However, should the neuromuscular patterns observed in the split-step protect the ACL from injury, research should also investigate whether split-step cutting manoeuvres display any performance detriment compared to side-step cutting manoeuvres.
机译:在分步切割过程中,所有受监视的肌肉都被同时招募以反映共收缩。相反,在分步切割过程中,首先要招募股直肌,然后是同步的股骨和内侧绳肌发作,然后是外侧绳肌发作。尽管起病之间存在细微的差异,但在两个切割动作中,绳肌都比股四头肌更早地停止活动。配对t检验表明,与分离步相比,股骨内侧肌在副步中表现出明显的早期发作(p \ u3c 0.02),而在分离步中,股直肌的爆发时间长于(p = 0.05)避开脚步。这些变化的神经肌肉模式在分步切割操作中是否对膝盖有保护作用,也许是由于减少了前抽屉,值得进一步研究。但是,如果在分步切割中观察到的神经肌肉模式可以保护ACL不受伤害,则研究还应调查与分步切割操作相比,分步切割操作是否表现出任何性能损害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号